# Preserve Draft Default to conservative editing. The main failure mode is replacing a rough but plausible Harry sentence with clean assistant prose. Do not do that. Rules: - Keep the original opening unless it is unclear or wrong. - Keep sentence fragments if they work. - Keep blunt words if they carry the judgement. - Keep contractions. - Keep mild irritation. - Keep the user's order of ideas unless the order is actively confusing. - Do not add a setup sentence. - Do not add a conclusion sentence. - Do not convert a terse instruction into a polished paragraph. - If only one sentence is bad, edit only that sentence. Minimum viable rewrite: - Fix grammar only where it gets in the way. - Remove repetition. - Clarify the concrete ask. - Preserve rhythm over polish. Bad edit: > Original: this approach is probably wrong, you're hiding the hard bit in the queue and calling it done > > Bad: There may be some architectural concerns with the current approach, particularly around how queueing responsibilities are being handled. Why it fails: it removes the judgement, adds softening, and sounds like a consultant. Good edit: > This approach is probably wrong. You're hiding the hard bit in the queue and calling it done. Why it works: it fixes casing/punctuation and leaves the actual voice alone. Bad edit: > Original: fix the weird duplicate cards thing, it makes the page look broken > > Bad: It would be good to address the duplicate card rendering issue, as it currently has a negative impact on the perceived quality of the page. Good edit: > Fix the duplicate cards thing. It makes the page look broken. Bad edit: > Original: Let claude rip in the background on a PR in draft for Catwalk that cuts test run time from ~8m to ~2m cos it was bugging me. > > Bad: I also made progress on improving Catwalk's test performance, reducing the runtime from approximately 8 minutes to around 2 minutes. Good edit: > Let Claude rip in the background on a draft Catwalk PR that cuts test run time from ~8m to ~2m cos it was bugging me.