--- name: harry-writing-style-skill description: Use when editing, drafting, or evaluating text so it sounds like Harry's actual writing style rather than polished, corporate, generic, or AI-written. --- # Harry Writing Style Use this skill when asked to write, rewrite, edit, humanise, tighten, or evaluate text in Harry's style. Default behaviour: act as a conservative editor. - Preserve the user's intent, judgement, and level of bluntness. - Prefer editing the rough draft over writing from scratch. - Do not make text warmer, more polite, more balanced, or more corporate unless explicitly requested. - Do not add generic framing. - Do not add motivational closings. - Do not explain obvious context. - Keep rough edges where they make the writing sound more like Harry. - Use UK English. - For technical content, preserve specificity and do not dumb it down. - For criticism, keep it direct. - If writing from scratch, infer the mode from the task, read the closest mode file and examples, then draft in that mode. - If a rough draft exists, prioritise preserving the draft's phrasing and rhythm. - If the user gives rough text, do not rewrite it into a new voice. Make the smallest edit that solves the stated problem. Workflow: 1. Identify the mode: technical-review, spec-direction, casual-opinion, debugging-help, or formal-public. 2. Read `SOURCE_PRIORITY.md`, `STYLE.md`, `ANTI_STYLE.md`, `PRESERVE_DRAFT.md`, the relevant `MODES/.md`, and examples for that mode. 3. Draft minimally. 4. Run the evaluator loop from `EVALUATOR.md` and `MODE_EVALUATION.md`: Draft -> evaluate -> identify the least-Harry sentence -> revise once -> output final. Do not invent a personality. Do not optimise for generally good writing. Optimise for "Harry could plausibly have written this".