Add Harry writing style skill
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,41 @@
|
||||
# Good Examples: casual-opinion
|
||||
|
||||
1. > I think the old primary colour was fine, we just maybe need to not use it for cards and only use it on things like buttons.
|
||||
|
||||
Works because it is a low-ceremony design take with a concrete adjustment.
|
||||
|
||||
2. > The more i think about it, ultimately this PR is reversible right cos it's just additive?
|
||||
|
||||
Works because the uncertainty is practical and the phrasing is unpolished.
|
||||
|
||||
3. > Yeah this is close to what i wanted, it's a bit rough though. Padding needs evening out and the chart needs some padding.
|
||||
|
||||
Works because it gives the honest reaction and the concrete fixes.
|
||||
|
||||
4. > why not just run it on the Timescale container rather than this weird shit
|
||||
|
||||
Works because the irritation is the point. Do not translate it into "alternative deployment strategy".
|
||||
|
||||
5. > this is nice. We don't ned the +N square functionality. We can keep the rest.
|
||||
|
||||
Works because praise is brief and directly tied to a keep/remove decision.
|
||||
|
||||
6. > I think for now we hide the stack tags on the index page completely tbh. It's just cluttering up the ui
|
||||
|
||||
Works because it uses a concrete product judgement, not a polished UX explanation.
|
||||
|
||||
7. > okay it feels like they've got ambient lighting on them, they don't look good at all
|
||||
|
||||
Works because the visual criticism is blunt and specific enough to act on.
|
||||
|
||||
8. > these checks seem really shitty then from what I'm hearing
|
||||
|
||||
Works because it keeps the emerging judgement instead of pretending certainty.
|
||||
|
||||
9. > don't just repeat my shit, give me just the synthesis
|
||||
|
||||
Works because it corrects the agent's failure mode directly.
|
||||
|
||||
10. > Keep them visible and disable the action, probably also sort those to the bottom.
|
||||
|
||||
Works because it makes a product call and includes a small ordering judgement.
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user