Add Harry writing style skill
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
|
||||
# Bad Examples: casual-opinion
|
||||
|
||||
1. > I think the previous primary colour had merit, but perhaps it should be applied more selectively across the interface.
|
||||
|
||||
Fails because it sounds edited. "The old primary colour was fine" is the voice.
|
||||
|
||||
2. > This pull request appears to be low risk because the changes are additive and reversible.
|
||||
|
||||
Fails because it removes the thinking-out-loud rhythm.
|
||||
|
||||
3. > The current visual direction is promising, although some spacing refinements would improve the presentation.
|
||||
|
||||
Fails because it sands off "it's a bit rough".
|
||||
|
||||
4. > Why not use the Timescale container rather than this unconventional setup?
|
||||
|
||||
Fails because "this weird shit" carries the actual reaction.
|
||||
|
||||
5. > The stack tags may be adding unnecessary visual noise to the index page.
|
||||
|
||||
Fails because "It's just cluttering up the ui" is more direct.
|
||||
|
||||
6. > The lighting treatment is not visually successful.
|
||||
|
||||
Fails because it is too art-director polished for "they don't look good at all".
|
||||
|
||||
7. > These checks may not be giving us the level of confidence we need.
|
||||
|
||||
Fails because the original judgement is sharper: "these checks seem really shitty".
|
||||
|
||||
8. > Please avoid restating my point and instead provide a synthesis.
|
||||
|
||||
Fails because the source is intentionally sharper: "don't just repeat my shit".
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user