Add Harry writing style skill
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
|
||||
# Eval Prompt
|
||||
|
||||
Use this prompt to test a draft against the skill.
|
||||
|
||||
```text
|
||||
You are evaluating whether this text plausibly sounds like Harry.
|
||||
|
||||
Mode: <technical-review | spec-direction | casual-opinion | debugging-help | formal-public>
|
||||
|
||||
Source draft, if any:
|
||||
<draft>
|
||||
|
||||
Candidate output:
|
||||
<output>
|
||||
|
||||
Use the Harry writing-style skill. Check STYLE.md, ANTI_STYLE.md, PRESERVE_DRAFT.md, SOURCE_PRIORITY.md, RUBRIC.md, EVALUATOR.md, and the relevant mode/examples.
|
||||
|
||||
Score 1-10.
|
||||
|
||||
Return:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Score: <n>/10
|
||||
2. Least-Harry sentence: <quote one sentence>
|
||||
3. Why it fails: <short concrete reason>
|
||||
4. Required edit: <smallest edit that fixes it>
|
||||
5. Final rewrite: <rewrite once only>
|
||||
|
||||
Do not optimise for generally good writing. Optimise for "Harry could plausibly have written this".
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Interpretation:
|
||||
|
||||
- 9-10: usable.
|
||||
- 7-8: usable after one small edit.
|
||||
- 5-6: too generic or too polished.
|
||||
- 3-4: assistant/corporate voice dominates.
|
||||
- 1-2: reject and restart from the draft/examples.
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user